KEEGAN AWARDED £2MILLION IN DAMAGES
Kevin Keegan felt vindicated after a tribunal awarded him £2million in damages from Newcastle for his constructive dismissal from the club last year.
Keegan walked out of a £3million-a-year contract in September 2008 following a row with the club over the loan signing of Ignacio Gonzalez against his wishes, sparking a stand-off which has taken more than a year to resolve.
The award fell way short of the £25million the 58-year-old had claimed in total as yet another unsavoury episode in the Magpies' chaotic recent history drew to a close.
There is little doubt the saga has been an obstacle to owner Mike Ashley's efforts to sell the club - sources on Tyneside insist administration was a possibility had the damages figure been significantly higher - and it remains to be seen whether or not the decision prompts prospective buyers to step up their interest.
Newcastle were making no comment on the matter after learning the outcome, and while it is understood there was disappointment that the independent arbitration panel, convened under Premier League rules almost three weeks ago, ruled against them, there was relief too at the financial implications of their decision.
For Keegan, who claimed £8.6million in lost wages and benefits for the remaining part of his contract, which was due to run until June 2011, and £16.5million in "stigma damages" for the effect on his future earning potential, there was vindication.
In a lengthy statement, he said: "I took the decision to resign in September 2008 only after very careful and anxious consideration.
"The decision to resign was one of the most difficult decisions that I have ever had to take in my life.
"I believe that anybody who knows me and my attachment to Newcastle United and the north-east in general will understand how difficult this must have been.
"I very much hope that the decision of the tribunal now confirms why I felt that I had no option but to resign from the position as manager of the club that I love.
"The tribunal has found the conduct of the club in forcing a player on me against my wishes represented a fundamental breach of my contract of employment.
"I do not believe that there is any manager in football who could have remained at the club in the light of their conduct."
Keegan departed amid a furious row over the loan signing of Uruguayan midfielder Gonzalez against his wishes on the final day of the 2008 summer transfer window.
Having reluctantly sanctioned James Milner's move to Aston Villa, he was frustrated at the way in which the club's own recruitment drive was being conducted, and when Gonzalez, who played only 38 minutes of football for the club, was foisted upon him, he decided enough was enough.
Newcastle insisted at the hearing that the manager was fully aware that executive director (football) Dennis Wise and his team would handle transfers, although the panel rejected their arguments.
Keegan said: "I resigned because I was being asked to sanction the signing of a player in order to 'do a favour' for two South American agents.
"No-one at the club had seen this player play and I was asked to sign him on the basis of some clips on YouTube.
"This is something that I was not prepared to be associated with in any way.
"The club knew that I objected strongly to this transfer and were aware that by continuing with it, I was likely to feel that I had no option but to resign.
"Notwithstanding this, they nevertheless went on to sign the player at very substantial cost to the club."
Keegan's exit provoked an angry response from the club's fans, who swiftly demanded that Ashley's 'Cockney mafia' went instead, although the sportswear magnate remains at the helm despite having twice put the business up for sale.
There has been some disquiet on Tyneside too since details of Keegan's financial demands emerged with the club already in severe financial difficulties in the wake of relegation from the Barclays Premier League.
The panel's 23-page report did not make for edifying reading as it outlined the whole sorry affair, revealing that earlier public statements from the regime at St James' Park that Keegan would indeed have the final say were dismissed by witnesses at the hearing as "an exercise in public relations".
The panel, which comprised Philip Havers QC, Lord Pannick QC and Kenneth Merrett, said: "We declare that Kevin Keegan was constructively dismissed by Newcastle United Football Club Ltd, for which Newcastle United Football Club Ltd must pay to Kevin Keegan damages in the sum of £2million plus interest to be assessed if not agreed."
The matter of costs is yet to be decided with both parties having been invited to make written submissions.
:thum: