Encryption Projects as SU group

S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
100
RE: Cudabiss96064.exe with cudart64_40_17.dll compiled

I found this in a folder on my dated 2017. So I have it a very long time, unfortunately at this stage it still crashes with my 980 card. I have run nvprofiler and it shows a memory bug In the code

Then I found the original archive ,dated 2015 however the original has pasword on it , ill get to hacking it later but it does contain cudabiss Cudabiss102464.exe

Which should imrpove things furthur

However testing on my remote pc, with a 3060 GPU shows a noteable increase in speed
some numbers as follow, and as im remotely connected speeds will be a little lower as gpu also is drawing the screen via VNC remote viewer

I7 7700 running at 4.3 GHZ
Windows 10
16GB ram
3060 TI 8GB stock

newer version cudabiss 1 copy stock

Processing time: 36561.218750 (ms)
Total amount of keys searched: 68734156800.000000
Resulting speed: 1879974528 keys/s

old version cudabiss 1 copy stock
Processing time: 65131.382813 (ms)
Total amount of keys searched: 68719476736.000000
Resulting speed: 1055090048 keys/s

New version, 3 instances, stock speeds no gpu overclock
863569792 keys/s
857031744 keys/s
862506048 keys/s
Combined 2583107584 keys/s

3060 New version, 4 instances, stock speeds no gpu overclock
661074304
654969216
655534400
660588736
Combined 2632166656 keys/s

old 3 copys stock, each instance
436965024
434284320
438396384
combined 1309645728 keys/s
 
S

sattechtips

Registered
Messages
426
moonbase said:
New test result with RTX 3090 Gigabyte Aorus Extreme.
Four instances at same time.
i7-5930k CPU, 16GB 3000MHz RAM
CPU and RAM at stock speeds.

4558 million keys per second = 4.558 billion keys per second.
Time to run the full range of biss keys = 17.15 hours.
Click to expand...
This with what version of cudabiss ? old shit or Cudabiss96064.exe ?
 
C

C0der

Registered
Messages
270
How does Cudabiss51264.exe with cudart64_40_17.dll compare to Cudabiss51264.exe with older dll on same card?

Sidenote: MS-Defender doesnt like the new Cudabiss.rar.
 
Last edited:
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
100
cudabiss51264,exe (new version)

Processing time: 41573.878906 (ms)
Total amount of keys searched: 68719476736.000000
Resulting speed: 1652.948352 keys/s

previous version 1050-1090 stock
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
100
Ok problem cracking the original archive
the hash.txt is this, if anyone can help in hashcat

$pkzip2$3*1*1*0*8*24*9c53*91d7*5925e8d7c4be5a1f98af1e68668f20cd224346749e4f2b3f2e6978cef5c4371e78ee99b1*1*0*8*24*32e7*93f6*ab8b565e6f76a9d997946464e3dca3f147ea2514a4772dc3a903d8564d2d7cf7773fc299*2*0*5f*88*319fc80c*4828df*36*8*5f*319f*0557*da848f6e8d186aad777ae95daaabeed779662f3804410d35096135c3acd4d3f8ae0b466772b9c8566ad362fcb14863d40c2dd12b6756494548058d4ed38edf7914e5abe0415e7e8461ec5dd5d155c189c09f4db6f90d106e11c23ded4e136c*$/pkzip2$
 
Last edited:
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
100
While hashcat does its thing one thing i noticed the cudabiss archive with the faster versions is dated 2015.

What gpu came out in 2015? well the 900 series...this means that at best it was optimized for these cards. However it fails on my 980 also crashing on someones 2080...
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
100
password cracked, test continues

runnning on 3060TI 8GB

version 96064, 4 instances, stock speeds no gpu overclock
661074304
654969216
655534400
660588736
Combined 2632166656 keys/s

version 102464 4 instances, stock speeds no gpu overclock
681642048 keys/s
673648832 keys/s
673277440 keys/s
676451968 keys/s
Combined 2705020288 keys/s



version 102464 1 instance

Processing time: 36460.046875 (ms)
Total amount of keys searched: 68719476736.000000
Resulting speed: 1884788352 keys/s

Processing time: 36262.171875 (ms)
Total amount of keys searched: 68719476736.000000
Resulting speed: 1895073280 keys/

Processing time: 36920.910156 (ms)
Total amount of keys searched: 68719476736.000000
Resulting speed: 1861261696 keys/s
 
M

moonbase

VIP
Donating Member
Messages
551
Tested v102464 with 3080Ti GPU and got:
Time to complete a full biss range is 16.81 hours

The speed from v102464 is slightly faster than v96064.
 
Last edited:
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
100
Here is the newer faster cudabiss, that is compiled for a higher version cuda dll
unfortunalty it apears to have a nvida driver crash when run on a 980 or 2080 gpu
but appears to be ok on 30 series

Filebin | ojs4atoimogzw4qv

Convenient file sharing. Think of it as Pastebin for files. Registration is not required. Large files are supported.
filebin.net filebin.net
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
100

dvlajkovic you imply an earlier post that you have access, to versions compiled with the higher dll is that correct? if so why have you not posted them​

 
dvlajkovic

dvlajkovic

Member
Messages
498
'cause I have not compiled nor found them - these are not public
that's why we are trying to make BF program
we have to go from scratch as no cudabiss source is available
will there be any useful product?
I do hope so, but there is no guaranty
 
S

sdrfgs

Registered
Messages
100
You can decompile from the .EXE using suitable tools if you are a programmer

I will get visual basic and try it for myself, though im not a programmer

also the cutter.re does similar
 
C

cayoenrique

Member
Messages
475
I been reading. But I have no Nvidia. It is ok to press a little from time to time, To see if others wakeup. But do not raise a lot your expectation as SU was always like that. Not many post responding soon. This is like a marathon not a 100 meter race.
 
M

moonbase

VIP
Donating Member
Messages
551
sdrfgs said:
Are other going to run it and test? or i'm wasting my time here?
Click to expand...

One thing is clear, anyone with better BF tools is not sharing them in the same spirit that you have shared your archives.
 
Last edited:
orangebirds

orangebirds

Member
Messages
344
sdrfgs said:
RE: Cudabiss96064.exe with cudart64_40_17.dll compiled

I found this in a folder on my dated 2017. So I have it a very long time, unfortunately at this stage it still crashes with my 980 card. I have run nvprofiler and it shows a memory bug In the code

Then I found the original archive ,dated 2015 however the original has pasword on it , ill get to hacking it later but it does contain cudabiss Cudabiss102464.exe

Which should imrpove things furthur

However testing on my remote pc, with a 3060 GPU shows a noteable increase in speed
some numbers as follow, and as im remotely connected speeds will be a little lower as gpu also is drawing the screen via VNC remote viewer

I7 7700 running at 4.3 GHZ
Windows 10
16GB ram
3060 TI 8GB stock

newer version cudabiss 1 copy stock

Processing time: 36561.218750 (ms)
Total amount of keys searched: 68734156800.000000
Resulting speed: 1879974528 keys/s

old version cudabiss 1 copy stock
Processing time: 65131.382813 (ms)
Total amount of keys searched: 68719476736.000000
Resulting speed: 1055090048 keys/s

New version, 3 instances, stock speeds no gpu overclock
863569792 keys/s
857031744 keys/s
862506048 keys/s
Combined 2583107584 keys/s

3060 New version, 4 instances, stock speeds no gpu overclock
661074304
654969216
655534400
660588736
Combined 2632166656 keys/s

old 3 copys stock, each instance
436965024
434284320
438396384
combined 1309645728 keys/s
Click to expand...
Nevermind, I've tried it
using GTX 1650, it look like this, running 3 instances

86303616+85944680+86055840 = 258304136 keys/s
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top